Battle of the Samsung Watches: Gear Live vs. Gear Fit vs. Gear 2

We look at the specs and features of Samsung’s new Gear Live and compare it to it’s Tizen-based predecessors, the Gear Fit and Gear 2.


Gear Live looks to improve upon Samsung’s past efforts in just about every way. This is a smartwatch that will pair with any Android device (4.3 or higher) and comes equipped large ecosystem of apps. Our reviews of both Gear Fit and Gear 2 reveal each device’s lackluster features. In comparison, the Gear Live has nearly identical specs to the Gear 2 but has a smaller price tag and better OS. To be fair, the Gear Live doesn’t emphasize its fitness components. In the gym though, Gear Live seems to be a worthy competitor of the Gear Fit. By the looks of it, Gear Live is the most advanced smartwatch from Samsung. What’s more, the $200 price tag renders the other Samsung smartwatch contenders obsolete.

Benchmark of LG G Watch vs. Samsung Gear Live

LG G Watch vs. Samsung Gear Live: Spec Showdown Digital Trends For instance, the Gear Live features a 300mAh battery opposed to the G Watch’s 400mAh, while additionally providing a magnetic charging cradle in lieu of the G Watch’s…


The Samsung Gear Live marks a considerable improvement over the company’s previous ventures in wearable tech, specifically the lackluster Gear Fit and Samsung-exclusive Gear 2. Still, neither option vastly outperforms the other at this point, even if the Gear Live also offers a heart-rate monitor, increased pixel resolution, and a lower price tag. Buyer choice may simply come down to individual aesthetics and customer preference, or how the two smartwatches perform and seamlessly integrate with their respective Android devices. Furthermore, the game may change again when the anticipated Moto 360 goes on sale later this summer.

Nvidia Refocuses Its Plan to Target Servers, Instead Promoting Its GPUs In ARM … – Trefis

Nvidia Refocuses Its Plan to Target Servers, Instead Promoting Its GPUs In ARM …
… to develop its own 64-bit ARM-based CPU processor for servers.


The server market is currently dominated by the x86 processors, which account for well over 80% of total server shipments. When combined with a GPU, the x86 processors can do more work per watt than a standalone x86 processor. ARM processors can help cut down on power consumption as they are known for their low power processors, an important criteria given the size and energy demands of most HPC (High Performance Computing) systems. AMD believes that ARM CPUs have the potential to account for 20% of the server market by 2016 or 2017

Android TV gives Intel a new shot at the market after previous failures

Android TV gives Intel a new shot at the market after previous failures
Intel is chasing the lucrative TV market once again by aligning with Google on Android TV despite multiple failed attempts in the past few years.


Intel is if anything persistent after selling OnCue to Verizon in January.  It is likely that Intel will supply chips for TVs, set-top boxes and devices like Chromecast. The goal is to put as many Intel chips as possible in more consumer electronics, which is a hot market right now.

ReWalk Bionic Suits Can Finally Be Sold in the US

After a spinal cord injury, there are few sentences more depressing than “She’ll never walk again.” Soon it may be uttered far less often: the ReWalk bionic suit , an assistive exoskeleton designed to give people with spinal cord injuries the…


Despite the steep price ~$70K,, we think this is an awesome technology to help paraplegics get back up and going – got to love it. 

GoPro’s I.P.O. Prices at Top of Range, Leading a Wave of Newly Public Companies

GoPro is only one of nearly 20 companies looking to make their market debuts this week, a pace unseen since the height of the dot-com boom in 2000.


GoPro is certainly profitable — and growing. Sales nearly doubled last year, to $985.7 million, while net income almost doubled, to $60.6 million. – My only question is why couldn’t Kodak and dozens of other camera makers have done this too?  – We think it’s because they were so wedded to their own incumbent technology they forget that the market evolves – it tuns out that companies that don’t seriously investigate new technologies to expand their offering’s do so at their own peril – MIT Professor Utterback pointed this out 1994 in his book  “Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation” – Live and learn I guess